DYNAMIC ALLOCATION DECISIONS TO THE PERFORMANCE-SEEKING AND LIABILITY-HEDGING PORTFOLIOS

Assuming that reasonable proxies for performance-seeking and liability-hedging portfolios have been designed using some of the afore-mentioned methodologies, we must still determine the optimal allocation strategy to those two building blocks. A series of novel paradigms, which we describe next, are reshaping our approaches to long-term investment decisions for long-term investors facing liability commitments and short-term performance constraints.

Accounting for the Presence of Investors’ Liability Commitments: The Liability-Driven Investment Paradigm

As explained earlier in this chapter, investors endowed with consumption/ liability objectives need to invest in two distinct portfolios, in addition to cash: one performance-seeking portfolio and one liability-hedging portfolio, construction methods that have been discussed in previous sections.
Formally, under the assumption of a constant opportunity set,141 we obtain the following expression of the fund separation theorem in the intertemporal context when trading is possible between current date and investment horizon:
361
This expression is similar to that in equation (7.2), extended to the asset-liability management setting. As appears from this equation, the allocation to the “risky” building block is a decreasing function of the PSP ...

Get The Theory and Practice of Investment Management: Asset Allocation, Valuation, Portfolio Construction, and Strategies, Second Edition now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.