References
Abrahamsson, M. (2002). Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk Analysis: Characterisation and Methods of Treatment. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ale, B. J. M. (2005). Tolerable or acceptable: A comparison of risk regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis, 25:231–241.
Amendola, A., Contini, S., and Ziomas, I. (1992). Uncertainties in chemical risk assessment: Results of a European benchmark exercise. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 29:347–363.
Andersen, H. R. (1999). An introduction to binary decision diagrams. Lecture notes, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anderson, E. L. and Hattis, D. (1999). Uncertainty and variability. Risk Analysis, 19:47–49.
Andrews, J. D. and Dunnett, S. J. (2002). Event-tree analysis using binary decision diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 49(2):230–238.
Andrews, J. D. and Moss, T. (2002). Reliability and Risk Assessment. Professional Engineering Publ., London.
Andrews, J. D. and Ridley, L. M. (2002). Application of the cause-consequence diagram method to static systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 75:47–58.
Apostolakis, G. and Moieni, P. (1987). The foundations of models of dependence in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliability Engineering, 18(3): 177–195.
ARAMIS (2004). Accidental risk assessment methodology for industries in the context of the Seveso II directive. Technical report EVSG1-CT-2001-00036, Fifth Framework ...
Get Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.
