REFLECTION QUESTIONS

  1. What has made Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation so appealing for so many years?
  2. Are Kirkpatrick's critics misinterpreting the intent of the model, or are the criticisms of the four levels well founded?
  3. Is Kirkpatrick's model missing anything important? If so, what are the implications of these missing variables?
  4. Can Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation be adapted to minimize its limitations and maximize its utility? If so, how? If not, why not?

Get Performance Evaluation: Proven Approaches for Improving Program and Organizational Performance now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.