You might think that this shading model is missing one important component. It doesn't take into account the effect of the distance to the light source. In fact, it is known that the intensity of radiation from a source falls off in proportion to the inverse square of the distance from the source. So why not include this in our model?
It would be fairly simple to do so, however, the visual results are often less than appealing. It tends to exaggerate the distance effects and create unrealistic-looking images. Remember, our equation is just an approximation of the physics involved and is not a truly realistic model, so it is not surprising that adding a term based on a strict physical law produces unrealistic ...
