REFERENCES

J. Ang, and Y. Cheng (2006). Direct evidence on the market driven acquisitions theory. Journal of Financial Research 29, 2: 199–216.

P. Anslinger, S. Klepper, and S. Subramaniam (1999). Breaking up is good to do. McKinsey Quarterly 1: 16–27.

M. Bradley, A. Desai, and E. Kim (1988). Synergetic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics 21: 3–40.

T. Chemmanur, and A. Yan (2002). Corporate control and disciplining effect of spin-offs: A theory of performance and value improvements in spin-offs. Boston College working paper.

P. Cusatis, J. Miles, and J. Woolridge (1993). Restructuring through spin-offs. Journal of Financial Economics 33, June: 293–311.

Z. Fluck, and A. Lynch (1999). Why do firm merge and then divers? A theory of financial synergy. Journal of Business 72, 3: 319–346.

A. Ghosh (2001). Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance 7, 2:151–178.

S. Gilson, P. Healy, C. Noe, and K. Palepu (1997). Information effects of spin-offs, equity carve-outs, and targeted stock offerings. Harvard University working paper.

P. Healy, K. Palepu, and R. Ruback (1990). Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers. MIT working paper.

S. Krishnaswami, and V. Subramaniam (1999). Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision. Journal of Financial Economics 53, July: 73–112.

I. Loughran, and A. Vijh (1977). Do ...

Get Handbook of Finance: Investment Management and Financial Management now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.