In their important paper. Merkle and Hellman [1978] published the first example of a trap-door public-key cryptosystem. They define a transformation relating

- A knapsack problem
*K*{*s, t*} with a knapsack vector*s*that is super-increasing and - A knapsack problem
*K*{*a, b, m*} modulo*m*with a seemingly*general*knapsack vector*a*.

It was intended that the transformation *K*{*s, t*} → *K*{*a, b, m*} satisfy three properties:

*K*{*a, b, m*} and*K*{*s, t*} are equivalent, meaning they have a common solution;- It is computationally infeasible to find a solution to
*K*{*a, b, m*}; - It is easy to find a solution to
*K*{*s, t*}.

We develop their ideas in this section.

Let SUP_{n}[*m*] be the subset of SUP_{n} that satisfies the *size condition*

Let denote the set of integers, referred to as *knapsack multipliers*, which are relatively prime to the modulus *m*. Each *ω* *∈* Ω_{m} has a multiplicative inverse *ω*^{−1} *∈* Ω_{m}; that is, 1 = *ωω*^{−1} (modulo *m*).

Note that the modulus *m* is *not* required to be a prime number.

*Example 11.8*

Table 11.3 lists the knapsack multipliers from *m* = 14.

*Example 11.9*

Table 11.4 lists the knapsack multipliers for *m* = 13. When *ω* is relatively prime to ...

Start Free Trial

No credit card required