Guidance from the Public

Investments in science and technology will likely bear economic fruit. However, investments to address the social, political, cultural and ethical issues surrounding applications of biotechnology are equally important. There are good ways to foster open dialogue on societal issues surrounding emerging technologies among experts, stakeholders and citizens.29 Many shy away from these activities, as it is impossible to accommodate everyone’s preferences. However, if groups and their members are heard, and their input is considered, not only will they be more likely to accept decisions, but also better decisions will be made.30

We should neither ignore the potential health and environmental risks of biotechnology, nor dismiss its promise. However, the arguments for or against applications will be trusted only if the sources are.31 We need to fund independent studies of impacts. Too often there is polarized debate because information presented comes from groups entrenched in their positions. Neutral think-tanks, academe, and respected organizations that do not have conflict of interests or large stakes in the outcomes, and where biases can be balanced, seem like good places for dialogue, policy analysis and safety research. Currently, there are few incentives for public engagement or the independent study of regulatory policy.

Likewise, there are few incentives for companies to provide information on the development and safety of potential products. Public and ...

Get A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.