Issuing Warnings
So, youâve found some vandalism or spam, and researched other edits by the same user account to see if thereâs more. The next, and important, step is to post an appropriate warning on the editorâs user talk page.
The primary purpose of a warning about vandalism or spam, perhaps counter-intuitively, is not to get the problem editor to change her ways. (It would be nice if she did so, but troublemakers arenât likely to reform themselves just because someone asked nicely.) Rather, when you and other editors post a series of increasingly strong warnings, youâre building a documented case for blocking a user account from further disruptive editing. If the warnings lead to a change of behavior of the editor before blocking is necessary, greatâbut donât hold your breath.
Choosing the Warning and Warning Level
Start by looking at the warnings that have already been posted on the user talk page, if any. Then take a look at the history tab for the user talk page: the editor might have deleted warnings by other editors.
Note
Thereâs much confusion as to whether editors are allowed to remove warnings from their user talk pages. They are. Deletion is considered to be confirmation that the warnings have been read, and the warnings remain visible via the âhistoryâ tab. For details, see the âRemoval of comments, warningsâ section of the guideline Wikipedia:User page (shortcut: WP:USER). So you must check the user talk pageâs history to see if prior warnings ...
Get Wikipedia: The Missing Manual now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.